To: mkmensinger; Steven W.
Wait, does this mean the FBI proceeded with electronic surveillance without the court’s permission?I was wondering what that meant, too. Or they kept asking and finally got the okays they wanted?
494 posted on
04/12/2019 4:16:12 PM PDT by
little jeremiah
(When we do not punish evildoers we are ripping the foundations of justice from future generations)
To: little jeremiah
Or they kept asking and finally got the okays they wanted?
*******************************
Or they kept going back to the well until they got the judge they needed.
496 posted on
04/12/2019 4:24:49 PM PDT by
Grimmy
(equivocation is but the first step along the road to capitulation)
To: little jeremiah
If they proceeded without permission, this becomes a very, very big deal...
To: little jeremiah; Steven W.
What you said, they kept trying till they got it. That doesn’t mean they didn’t spy before getting it, but getting it made spying “legal” in their minds. Maybe they finally got in front of Strzok’s friend.
517 posted on
04/12/2019 5:53:21 PM PDT by
Defiant
(I may be deplorable, but I'm not getting in that basket.)
To: little jeremiah
Or they had been surveilling all along while they perfected the dossier to get the FISA warrant. We figure they had been watching Trump since the BC Hunt in 2012, maybe since the Tea Party in ‘10.
531 posted on
04/12/2019 6:30:49 PM PDT by
ichabod1
(He's a vindictive SOB but he's *our* vindictive SOB.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson