No it wouldn’t
For example see post 268 where the very troll that started this thread accidentally proved that q posted something a year before it was released publicly
That the Mueller investigation was done in April of 2018
Besides
I suggest you don’t take anyone’s word for it you go see for yourself
Quite a different tact than the name calling shills
“That the Mueller investigation was done in April of 2018.”
That’s the article’s speculation. I’ve indicated the facts suggest it was earlier.
I pointed out the QAnon post that you’re wrong about that like the QAnon grifters.
The evidence is that the Mueller scam investigation stopped pursuing Russia Collusion in 2017 and focused on building an obstruction case.
That only shows QAnon wrong yet again. You have trouble dealing with these among many other problematic facts.
That’s ok. I can help correct it.
Here I am ready to be convinced. Show me. Produce some links to the specific claims that most convince you of the veracity of Q. Provide a reason to agree there’s something to it.
The thing is, if the evidence were so overwhelming and convincing as is claimed, these simple requests should be no problem whatsoever to fulfill. I am genuinely interested in knowing if such evidence actually exists.
What this looks like from this perspective is that a bunch of people got a lot of bluster but nothing to back it up in terms of concrete reality. I cannot tell the difference between this phenomenon and people who sincerely believe horoscopes tell their futures.
So show me the difference. If you got it. You’re supposed to be the expert, according to the other guy. I stand ready to be convinced if there is anything convincing to be found.