Posted on 04/04/2019 6:54:40 AM PDT by NRx
City of Washington April 4, 1841- An all-wise Providence having removed from this life, William Henry Harrison, late President of the United States, we have thought it our duty, in the recess of Congress, and in the absence of the Vice President from the Seat of Government, to make this afflicting bereavement known to the country, by this declaration, under our hands.
He died at the President's House, in this city, this fourth day of April, Anno Domini 1841, at thirty minutes before one o'clock in the morning.
The people of the United States, overwhelmed by an event so unexpected and so melancholy, will derive consolation from knowing that his death was calm and resigned, as his life has been patriotic, useful and distinguished; and that the last utterance of his lips expressed a fervent desire for the perpetuity of the Constitution, and the preservation of its true principals. In death, as in life, the happiness of his Country was uppermost in his thoughts.
Daniel Webster Secretary of State
Thomas Ewwing Secretary of the Treasury
John Bell Secretary of War
JJ Crittenden Attorney General
Francis Granger Postmaster General
(Excerpt) Read more at chroniclingamerica.loc.gov ...
The respectful language of this bygone era is almost poetic.
I agree. Our manners (to the extent we have any) and form of conversation would be a source of great embarrassment to our forefathers. Times do change. But not always for the better.
That’s some writing. No journalist today could write like that.
How many people in that room were saying, “Oh shit...what now?”
And the poor guy was so sick and that they could not “bleed him.” Isn’t that a shame!
And the final burst of diarrhea that sank him. Can you imagine anyone today writing that the President—leader “of the free world” literally “shit the bed.”
People really need to read “real” history. There is a lot to learn.
Wasn’t there a push later to have Tyler become President of the Confederacy? I know he was getting old, but I have a vague memory of that....can anyone clarify?
“The Constitution of the United States is the instrument containing this grant of power to the several departments composing the Government. On an examination of that instrument it will be found to contain declarations of power granted and of power withheld. The latter is also susceptible of division into power which the majority had the right to grant, but which they do not think proper to intrust to their agents, and that which they could not have granted, not being possessed by themselves.
“In other words, there are certain rights possessed by each individual American citizen which in his compact with the others he has never surrendered. Some of them, indeed, he is unable to surrender, being, in the language of our system, unalienable.
…
“The spirit of liberty is the sovereign balm for every injury which our institutions may receive. On the contrary, no care that can be used in the construction of our Government, no division of powers, no distribution of checks in its several departments, will prove effectual to keep us a free people if this spirit is suffered to decay; and decay it will without constant nurture. To the neglect of this duty the best historians agree in attributing the ruin of all the republics with whose existence and fall their writings have made us acquainted.
“The same causes will ever produce the same effects, and as long as the love of power is a dominant passion of the human bosom, and as long as the understandings of men can be warped and their affections changed by operations upon their passions and prejudices, so long will the liberties of a people depend on their own constant attention to its preservation.
“The danger to all well-established free governments arises from the unwillingness of the people to believe in its existence or from the influence of designing men diverting their attention from the quarter whence it approaches to a source from which it can never come. This is the old trick of those who would usurp the government of their country. In the name of democracy they speak, warning the people against the influence of wealth and the danger of aristocracy. History, ancient and modern, is full of such examples. Caesar...Cromwell...and Bolivar possessed himself of unlimited power with the title of his country’s liberator.
…
“If parties in a republic are necessary to secure a degree of vigilance sufficient to keep the public functionaries within the bounds of law and duty, at that point their usefulness ends. Beyond that they become destructive of public virtue, the parent of a spirit antagonist to that of liberty, and eventually its inevitable conqueror. We have examples of republics where the love of country and of liberty at one time were the dominant passions of the whole mass of citizens, and yet, with the continuance of the name and forms of free government, not a vestige of these qualities remaining in the bosoms of any one of its citizens.
It was the beautiful remark of a distinguished English writer that “in the Roman senate Octavius had a party and Anthony a party, but the Commonwealth had none.”
“Yet the senate continued to meet in the temple of liberty to talk of the sacredness and beauty of the Commonwealth...and the people assembled in the forum, not, as in the days of Camillus and the Scipios, to cast their free votes for annual magistrates or pass upon the acts of the senate, but to receive from the hands of the leaders of the respective parties their share of the spoils...
“The spirit of liberty had fled, and, avoiding the abodes of civilized man, had sought protection in the wilds of Scythia or Scandinavia; and so under the operation of the same causes and influences it will fly from our Capitol and our forums. A calamity so awful, not only to our country, but to the world, must be deprecated by every patriot and every tendency to a state of things likely to produce it immediately checked.
“Such a tendency has existed—does exist. Always the friend of my countrymen, never their flatterer, it becomes my duty to say to them from this high place to which their partiality has exalted me that there exists in the land a spirit hostile to their best interests—hostile to liberty itself. It is a spirit contracted in its views, selfish in its objects. It looks to the aggrandizement of a few even to the destruction of the interests of the whole.
“The entire remedy is with the people.”
The spirit of liberty is the sovereign balm for every injury which our institutions may receive. On the contrary, no care that can be used in the construction of our Government, no division of powers, no distribution of checks in its several departments, will prove effectual to keep us a free people if this spirit is suffered to decay; and decay it will without constant nurture.
wow, thanks for posting. that is worth repeating. often.
thank you for that clarification.
Poignant that he died in 62.
Sam Houston died in 63.
Very sad, if you think about it.
Tyler was not a popular president. He was expelled from the Whig Party over is support for slavery and the schism helped speed the party’s decline. He remained a staunch champion of states rights and supported Virginia’s secession in 1861. Jefferson Davis of Mississippi was elected as the Confederate President before Virginia left the Union so Tyler was never a serious candidate for that office. But he was elected to a seat in the Rebel Congress. He died before taking the seat though.
Two interesting points of trivia...
*Tyler was the only US President to receive no official acknowledgement from the Federal Government on his death. The Confederates however, did accord him a formal funeral with full honors.
* John Tyler (b 1790) has TWO(!) living grandsons. Tyler married twice and his second wife was much younger. They kept begatting children well into his old age. And at least one of his sons carried on the family tradition of marrying younger women deep into his old age and also was busy begatting late in life.
The lesson from his death? Keep you inaugural speech short.
FYI, for you history buffs, William Henry Harrison’s grave site is located just outside of Cincinnati. If you ever fly into Cincinnati Airport, which is actually on the Kentucky side of the Ohio River, the grave site is an easy 10 minute drive from the airport. Worth a stop.
Tyler served in the Confederate House of Reps but died in 1862. It would have been just more upheaval in the South had he been President.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.