Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Pollster1

Polygraphs don’t work, and are inadmissible as evidence.


3 posted on 03/31/2019 5:28:16 AM PDT by dinodino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: dinodino
Polygraphs don’t work, and are inadmissible as evidence.

Not quite accurate - NSA and CIA continue to use them because they are a useful indicator. I would not allow an illegal invader to stay based on passing a polygraph, but I would certainly deport any foreign criminal who failed that test. Polygraphs are not perfect and their admissibility as evidence varies. They are allowed in court in: Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Delaware, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Dakota, Ohio, Utah, Washington, Wyoming. Additionally, they can be used in California, Arizona, Nevada, Georgia, and Florida, if both parties must agree. Since immigration hearings are not a criminal trial, I'd like to see our Justice Department use polygraphs to streamline the process of deporting invaders.

7 posted on 03/31/2019 8:47:04 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson