That my friend is a GREAT find!
Repost from BiggBob, and screenshot of the original Q post # 1111
I went back to find the original post that Q quoted in 1111 and found it at # 988
This is the post prior, Post 987
Has there been some talk in the news this week about a need to appoint another "Special Council?" Why yes. Yes, there has...
Johnathan Turley on "Why Huber is better than a special prosecutor"
From the Article: "Professor Jonathan Turley, a top national legal expert on government investigations, commented on Thursday about Attorney General Jeff Sessions decision to bring in U.S. Attorney John Huber. Turley called it brilliant to combine all the powers of the U.S. Department of Justices inspector general with a prosecutor who can bring charges, seek indictments, and get results for President Trump far more quickly than a second special counsel.
Also FTA: Sessions sent a letter to House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-VA), House Oversight Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy (R-SC), and Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA), informing them that Huber is conducting a full-fledged criminal investigation into all the matters Republicans are calling for a special counsel to investigate. Huber has been investigating these possible crimes since November 13, 2017.
So the IG report reveals the reason to "Trust Sessions" and Sessions will be the next target of the [D] party attacks.
IG report exposes RR problems. (Exposes his hat color?)
IG report exposes "Huber has been investigating these possible crimes since November 13, 2017."
The only step left is to start unsealing indictments... Right?
Seals broken.
[A]rrests.
Post 55
5:5?
Wow 55 was so long ago and I don’t think there was even a concept of maintaining references by post number... 5:5
Between those old posts and the new patriots fight board with all the placeholders I think Q is laying out the roadmap of what is coming over the next few months
Here are the “placeholders”
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3735167/posts?page=1005#1005
*strange coincidence* that Turley’s article is (almost) exactly a year ago?