Yes, I was very disappointed in Sundance for that, and have taken his arguments with a grain of salt also. On this one, I think he has a good analysis.
I read some of it (just too many things I have to do in my so-called “real life”!) and I think because of his non-Q stance, and therefore “Trust the Plan” is not his mindset, his bias is getting in the way of objectivity. Just an example:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
“Team Mueller intentionally tells AG Barr they cannot make a determination of obstruction, and thereby force Barr to make the decision; and make it look political.”
“The obstruction angle was always what Team Mueller were working to deliver, in collaboration with their democrat political allies.”
“In my opinion it’s almost certain AG Barr saw this coming, which is why he forced DAG Rod Weaselstein to stick around, share in the decision and deflect the politics.”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The other option for Mueller not making a determination about obstruction, would be so the “popular among Dems” (at least for now, was voted 97-3 in Senate) RR would be party to making that determination and thus making the “no obstruction” statement with more punch. If RR were actually bad, a Weaselstein, why does he keep saying and doing things that help and support Trump and MAGA? Wouldn’t he being doing or saying something bad?