[pgkdan]

Does anyone know if a new Special Counsel could just use all of the previous research done by IG Horowitz (Sp?) or Huber?

Horowitz and Huber are already working in tandem...why would we need a new SC? We don't. Q has said so and I completely agree.

[little jeremiah]

My reply to Kalam about SC, posted on the old thread this morning:

Q has several times stated that a Special Counsel takes years and is much less efficient or useful or some words to that effect, than what Huber is ALREADY doing right now and has for some time.

DiGenova is either out of the loop entirely or pretending he doesn’t know that investigations into this wrongdoing are happening right now and have been ongoing at least from 2018 or a bit before, I can’t remember dates.

So the idea that the FBI/DOJ etc wrongdoing needs to start to be investigated is actually quite silly.

[Kalam]

I didn’t say we needed a SC. I read some pundit who said there needs to one. I was just asking “IF” a new SC was appointed could they use the information already gathered by the IG and Huber?