She was their OWNER! If course she had access to the dogs especially if it was a voluntary quarantine.
How do you know that it was a voluntary quarantine? The article did not say that.
Why was she allowed out there with the dogs? You don’t have those facts - only an unwarranted assumption. But you’re criticizing me for asking.
It should be obvious that there is a potential for an expensive wrongful death lawsuit if the woman was not supposed to be in there with the dogs.
I understand that most of you here think that pitbull owners should be put to death in the most painful manner possible, but fortunately that’s not the law.
I did not indicate I “disliked” any of the *facts*.
What I have done is clearly outline the fact(s) that are missing. Apparently only pit bull stories require fewer facts than other stories.
Do not email me again.