No, I am saying there is more to this than reported. But because the cops (well, actually the press liaison) claim the dogs are pit bulls (maybe they are, but most cops don’t know their ass from a hole in the ground about dog breeds) no more facts are required. I want more info.
No matter what kind of dogs are involved, are you not the least bit curious what really happened? Again, there is more to this than we are reading. I don’t care about the dog breed, something smells funky about this incident. Just say pit bull and we are not allowed to ask for any facts. Sort of like when the Democrats cry racist, everyone is required to shut up.
The problem here isn't the lack of information, it is that you don't like the information that is there.
1) Dogs attacked someone.
2) Dogs held at a vet for observation following the attack
3) Owner visits dogs and is allowed to walk them in a secure enclosure.
4)Dogs attack owner 5) Dogs prevent bystander from assisting injured woman
6) Cops arrive, dogs prevent them from helping woman, cops shoot dogs
7) Cops confirm that the killer dogs are pit bulls.
What facts do you see missing?
This occurred at an animal hospital where the dogs were being held. I’d say they’d have about as good an idea of the breed of dog as anyone.
The denial from those Freepers who reflexively defend these vicious dogs is amazing!
I don’t think they know how it actually happened yet, as the owner took both of them out of the building and was walking them in an area enclosed by a tall fence when they attacked her and had her on the ground. There evidently were no witnesses to the incident. She was discovered after the attack. The dogs wouldn’t let anyone near her to help her. She was found unconscious, according to the broadcast reporter.