The issue is not whether the criminals in the demparty and the deep state are guilty and belong in prison. Of course they do. And I hope the new AG agrees and prosecutes aNd imprisons them.
The issue of trying civilian US citizens who are not unlawful combatants is well settled. There is NO likelihood at all that any tribunals are going to be used on any political figure. Period. It violates the law and the Constitution. That is just one of many idiotic notions that these conspiracy nuts don’t understand and will never accept. Never. They would rather believe anonymous kooks who invent a game for money than consult people who actually know the law.
Nothing undermines legitimate desire to prosecute criminals like Hillary, etc more than crazy conspiracy nonsense.
Some of the writers you mentioned know that. That is why they will not be identified with this totally discredited nonsense. Some of theses folks are minor pundits, some make a few buck on advertising but all of them are smart enough not to be thought of as nutwads. Unlike some of our FRiends who will believe till they’re dying day. Regardless of the evidence.
Watching this from the Kavanaugh hearing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oOAkU_4iPYA
I believe that Graham is asking this question because The Clinton’s among others, are going to be proven to have been involved in crimes in accordance with the manor described.
I agree that many of the crimes would still have to be tried by the normal criminal process. But I believe that some will fit the manor described by Graham. What I am not sure of is if espionage with the purpose of compromising the security of the united states would fit the profile of being a terrorist activity.