I don’t know of course - but I think what they did was tempt @Jack into doing something that has apparently been done - if you follow back & forth between generally & myself + others above leading up to the “Q” post.
If I read correctly, @Jack just did something that moved the top response out of the picture (LITERALLY!) and by so doing ... well that would be highly illegal in purview of FTC & the good guys were probably monitoring - whether that was intended to be caught or realized (seeing same things we were) ... dunno ... but another “proof” that this is the bestest plan ever!
WWG1WGA :)
oh, best explanation!
Many thanks for your analysis !
@jack has jacked once too many times with the 1st Amendment...