I like that - I’ve always thought the same, proof of AS[187] would demolish the DS.
FYI I see a speculation elsewhere that [+21][+2][+4] could refer to portraits #2 (Yates) and #4 [LL] tomorrow? TBD :)
” [+21][+2][+4] could refer to portraits #2 (Yates) and #4 [LL] tomorrow? TBD :)”
~~~~~
I’ll take it!!! (although the feminists will go crazy, lol..)