Posted on 03/16/2019 12:36:05 PM PDT by ransomnote
Google Translate says, "The board also has my almonds." No joke.
Or is it?
Text on bottom (anon comments) is small and hard to read, this is what it says:
"Is this pic a direct reference to your Sep 5 drops? Filename of pic matches exactly. Pic related."
"Anons, other drops on that day relate to HRC panic and declass of FISA."
According to 8ch, @jack tweeted his location (Chitose-shi, Hokkaido) and the Japanese flag, then 2 minutes later Q thanked him for playing.
I wonder if @jack is really in Japan and if so, what he’s up to there. And if not, then why did he tweet that he was?
Can you please record here, with as much detail as you can remember, the sequence of events?
Thank you.
freeze his passport!!! that’s one way to find out where he is, lol....
Amen to that.
I add:
“For though we live in the world, we do not wage war as the world does. The weapons we fight with are not the weapons of the world. On the contrary, they have divine power to demolish strongholds. We demolish arguments and every pretension that sets itself up against the knowledge of God, and we take captive every thought to make it obedient to Christ.”
2 Cor. 10:3-5
Wow, this story has a lot of twists and turns.
[-1]
To the best of my recollection..... (things were moving FAST)
I looked at POTUS tweet of MAGA. I mentioned that in my post 740.
Then I noticed that Steven W. posted (742) that the K brothers weren’t in their usual top spots, but that Ryan Hill was on top. So I went back and expanded the POTUS tweet to see replies, but instead of Ryan Hill, I saw @qanon. So I posted back to Steven W. about that (744)
Then I was thinking maybe bedtime. (Haha! So glad I checked Q and FR a few more times!)
Answered a few more posts. Missed Steven W. (749) until later and missed the significance of it until later.
Next I saw that Q posted 3108.
Checked @POTUS again and Ryan Hill was on top. (WHAT???!!!) (759)
Checked again and @qanon on top (762)
I’m not exactly sure where in this sequence I saw Q 3109. Maybe not yet.
Then I posted (765) that it was amazing seeing the back and forth!
At some point I saw Q3109 which basically explained what I’d been witnessing.
When I posted (823) @qanon was still on top.
Side note: There very well could have been even more flip-flops of who was on top. But this is a record of what I saw, with pretty good corroboration from the time stamps of my posts and from Steven W.’s observations, too.
Does that help? If you have questions please ask ASAP before I forget any details!
[-1]
RUH-ROH:
https://www.fec.gov/help-candidates-and-committees/candidate-taking-receipts/types-contributions/
Types of contributions
Contributions are the most common source of campaign support.
A contribution is anything of value given, loaned or advanced to influence a federal election. It is important to understand which receipts are considered contributions because:
Contributions count toward the threshold that determines whether an individual has qualified as a candidate under the Federal Election Campaign Act (the Act).
Contributions are subject to the Acts prohibitions against contributions from certain sources.
Contributions are subject to the Acts limits on the amount of contributions.
Like all receipts, contributions are also subject to the Acts recordkeeping and reporting requirements.
MOAR....
Well...that was fun! How are we supposed to go to sleep now??!!??
Thanks for posting that.
I gotta go nite nite just when it’s getting really exciting.
Thank you.
That's Ms. Round-Heels Harris.
Thank you very much ... and Steven W. too of course!
Eyewitness, contemporaneous accounts are the BEST history, as there are those who will immediately try to revise it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.