/lightning bolt.
Naaahhhh.... Nothing to see here.
Good catch.
Yes, and the bottom line is?
I think Simpson needs to have a little talking to.
Every video that is taken by a digital recorder is technically altered....
Because we would need multiple gigabytes per minute of disk space per video ...
MPEG compression alters recorded video from what the CCD takes so it can fit on the disc.
That would be like saying the MP3 recording of a police confession is in admissable as evidence...
I hate liberal scum buckets...
The local TV news here (in a conservative area) was always careful to refer to the Planned Parenthood videos as “altered”or “edited’, thus questioning their authenticity. Funny, they never referred to the CBS Evening News that they broadcast in the same terms.
By now that should have been corrected. How about the Covington Catholic lawyer give ‘em a call.
How utterly Chinese of them.
https://www.nationalreview.com/2016/07/planned-parenthood-videos-debunking-debunkers/
Sounds like a little Saul Alinsky method, keep it up somebody will believe it.
The media labeled this as “doctored video” and dismissed it.
Of course all video has editing, anything shown on TV. That said, there was NOTHING untrue about what was shown.
What is more disgusting, profiting from abortions or covering it up?
We should also remember that the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the CMP videos WERE NOT ALTERED!!
From the article: “ Four years later, we learn from the 5th Circuit that the videos were neither selectively edited, nor was it false to say that Planned Parenthood associates circumvented legal, medical, and ethical guidelines in pursuit of salvaging human remains.”
Yes - “Wikipedia.”. . . which is fairly reliable when the topic doesn’t have political implications—
but otherwise, not so much. You know, like The New York Times, etc.