The American Journal of Political Science published a correction... “The interpretation of the coding of the political attitude items in the descriptive and preliminary analyses portion of the manuscript was exactly reversed,” the journal said in the startling correction.
What that means is, the "error" was deliberate, and actually help prove that the corrected conclusion is excruciatingly correct. Thanks SaxxonWoods.
Gee, almost reminds one of the Global Warming temperature recording issues, doesn’t it?