Replies

Given that Sessions was recused, who do you think Huber "appropriately" gave those recommendations to?

I am not aware that Huber has provided a report thus far. If that is public knowledge and you have a link handy, please direct me that way. If a report had been delivered, it would most likely be in the hands of Rosenstein/Sessions. If a report had been delivered and sat on, it would be sat on by Rosenstein/Sessions. But now both the democrats and the republicans are aware of the report being requested, and both teams think it damages the other side. They both know they were lied to when it was said no such request was made. The pressure to release it mounts. And there is a new sheriff in town, Barr, who might just be pleased to chime in. These are exciting times.

I am not aware that Huber has provided a report thus far. If that is public knowledge and you have a link handy, please direct me that way. If a report had been delivered, it would most likely be in the hands of Rosenstein/Sessions. If a report had been delivered and sat on, it would be sat on by Rosenstein/Sessions.

I'll rephrase.

Given that Sessions was recused, who do you think Huber would "appropriately" give those recommendations to?

But now both the democrats and the republicans are aware of the report being requested, and both teams think it damages the other side. They both know they were lied to when it was said no such request was made.

I'm not sure what was said under testimony, do you have a link. But all Democrats and Republicans were made aware of the Sessions/Boyd memos back in January of 2018, so there's nothing new in this letter.

The pressure to release it mounts. And there is a new sheriff in town, Barr, who might just be pleased to chime in. These are exciting times.

I'm certainly more optimistic with the new sheriff, Barr, than I was with the old sheriff. Hopefully Trump releases the docs soon and Barr does his job.