[philman_36]

Of course Huber could use congressional testimony.
But that doesn't mean that Ohr was interviewed by Huber.
There would be no need to interview Ohr if his Congressional testimony was all that was needed.
If all of the questions that needed to be asked were asked and answers
were given to those questions then what more do you want him to be asked?
Boxers or briefs? What is "is"?

[FreeReign]

There would be no need to interview Ohr if his Congressional testimony was all that was needed. If all of the questions that needed to be asked were asked and answers were given to those questions then what more do you want him to be asked? Boxers or briefs? What is "is"?

That's "If" all of the questions that were needed, were asked.

That's a pretty big if.

I highly doubt that a normal FBI investigation wouldn't want to ask Ohr some follow up questions. Especially given the format of how questions are asked on a Congressional committee.

[AnthonySoprano]

The DoJ Investigated Manafort and declined to prosecute him. Prosecutors don’t rely on old interviews, especially interviews not designed to produce an Indictment. To the contrary, the old interview is used against the Subject and unbeknownst to the subject. Mueller didn’t rely on old interviews and old decisions. We have a Prosecutor not acting like a Prosecutor. Just like Comey and Hillary. . .