The filing points out, in a part that Bob Ireland noted, that the hack is “based on information and belief”, which is legalese for “I kinda think this is how it happened”, and argues that if the DNC can’t tell whether it suffered an interception at all, whether the Trump campaign knew about it or whether the campaign made use of it.
“even though the DNC hired a “cybersecurity technology firm” to “investigate the attack” and conduct a “forensic analysis of the DNC’s computer network”...the DNC pleads interception only “upon information and belief”....If the DNC cannot tell whether there was an interception, the Campaign surely cannot have known or had reason to know there was an interception.”
The filing does not say that the RATS fabricated the hack, as you note. It says there is no factual allegation of a hack or of use by the campaign, even after Crowdstrike got to look at the evidence. As I said previously, it is a shot across the bow, indicating that forensic analysis of the server, if it still exists, will be an issue, and the DNC BS will not survive the discovery process.
let’s not overlook the connections between crowdstrike the Clintons, Perkins coie and the DNC
https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/scandals-collide-dossier-dnc-server-perkins-coie/
In its capacity as attorney for the DNC, Perkins Coie – through another of its partners, Michael Sussman – is also the law firm that retained CrowdStrike, the cyber security outfit, upon learning in April 2016 that the DNC’s servers had been hacked.
What Is CrowdStrike? Firm Hired By DNC Has Ties To Hillary Clinton, A Ukrainian Billionaire, And Google
Yep. Which is why I OCR'd the whole page, and why I propose that the whole mythology of the DNC server 'hack' is strictly for public consumption - part of the propaganda war being waged by HRC.
Mythology just about sums up the HRC machine effort for two years now. Good grief! Lanny Davis as Michael Cohen's attorney?! 😂