Lol again?
Ok then bye
To: JockoManning
“But the whole Q-Team strategy is to out sensitive stuff by having the anons search Socratic questions’ answers out themselves.”
That’s my favorite part of the whole thing! Q puts up gibberish, and other people make up what it means. What if they are wrong? Will Q correct them? If so, why doesn’t Q speak clearly in the first place?
Oh, but Q has to code things because, secrets or something. Which aren’t secrets because the anons tell us what Q means.
Good grief.
794 posted on 10/1/2018, 1:08:37 PM by SaxxonWoods
To: JockoManning
Here’s the problem. Q spends more time insisting we all “believe” than on anything else. Q sounds like Tinkerbell, who will disappear if no one believes. I think Q is accurate on that.
But, it this is all real, it doesn’t matter if we believe it or not.
Except when Q says it’s a huge battle for humanity, and “welcome to the police state”.
Q sounds much more like a Leftist disinformation scheme than whatever Q followers claim. I can’t figure out any purpose for Trump have Q. I can figure out reasons for Leftists or pranksters to have Q.
Q serves no purpose. Q followers were already Trumpists and still are, just like me. I don’t have to hang on every utterance of Q, All I have to do is follow open sources.
791 posted on 10/1/2018, 1:04:02 PM by SaxxonWoods
Our “guest” is a coward about the scope of evil perpetrated on America, disguised in a display of judgmental pronouncements typical of a pushy professorial p^!{k, whose fears and need for hand holding are not being indulged on this Thread.
Disappointing who it is that sympathizes with this brief display of unfriendly harrumphing.
Yes, my first problems when I tried to make sense of Q. But I kept reading after a break and thought...this looks very interesting.
And now, the DIA thing?
A bridge too far. It’s very disappointing as this means President Trump and the rest of us are in real danger after all. I wish everyone good luck, we’re going to need it.