As a general rule, those who own media outlets of any kind take a very dim view of people using their property to criticize them.
Rush Limbaugh once banned a long-time caller (from Maine, but I don’t remember his name) because the caller criticized Rush live, on the show.
Perhaps if you had founded and built up a media property yourself, you would understand the reasons for this.
Of course, a media property that censors criticism of itself is basically a magnificent exercise in hypocrisy.
And perhaps I understand the definition of hypocrisy as well.
Most forums I frequent actually include in their posting rules something about not being allowed to comment on the quality of the site or how it is administered. I was temp banned from a site for doing that once.
At least one I frequent doesn’t even allow you to discuss the banning practices of OTHER sites. i.e. this thread would violate that site’s policies if it was there.
Tom are you bowing as you wrote that
I mean come on