I took a deep dive into research on the Q-Trump-Sessions disconnect by going back and laying out a timeline. People that were arguing over the disconnect were missing the timeline.
The timeline showed that Sessions was to be rewarded for his support on the campaign trail especially at rallies in Alabama. When asked what role he would like to fill in the Trump Administration, Sessions responded that he had enjoyed his experience as state attorney general and so signaled his preference to be considered for US AG.
President-Elect Trump promised that he would give weight to nominating Jeff to be US AG.
Early in 2017, President Trump was derided in every way imaginable and was privately ridiculed for not understanding the whys and wherefores of Capitol Hill politics, and further that this President was unable or unwilling to learn from the wiser sages of that arena. The insiders of DC politics were snickering that Trump was an idiot.
Against this backdrop, as a very longterm DC inside player, Sessions walked the fine line between his snickering DC colleagues and associates, and the childish President. When the fake witch hunt based on scandalous dossiers and FISA warrants came into view, Sessions actually thought Trump would be forced out and so Sessions did what he had always done in DC which was to go along to get along. He was pressured to recuse and he did so.
Sessions also feared the Clinton mob. He knew there was a criminal network behind them and he wanted to stay out of the fight.
The recusal was not strategic, it was not some part of 4-D chess, it was just Sessions defaulting to his DC insider persona.
President Trump was shocked, then angry that Sessions had recused himself. The recusal was a show of disloyalty, a withdrawal of political support, a lack of moral fortitude and commitment. As the President called Sessions into his office, he attempted to pin Sessions down on how he arrived at a decision to recuse. The President was not persuaded and so he called in his political team to discuss firing Sessions. The President was advised that firing Sessions could make the President appear guilty. The President reluctantly and disapprovingly stepped back and accepted the words and advice that Sessions would appoint others (Huber working with IG) to monitor the Russia collusion schemers but from a different prosecutorial angle such as Clinton Foundation crime.
The President agreed reluctantly to “Trust Sessions” and Q repeated that refrain.
As time went by, the President saw more and more that Sessions wasn’t getting the job done and grew increasingly frustrated to the point that he stated publicly to the press “I don’t have an Attorney General”.
Q stopped posting anything having to do with “Trust Sessions”.
The Q-Trump-Sessions episode was a blip on the radar. It came and it went. It’s long gone now.
Q
Very possible. Once a person becomes a US senator, any courage, honesty or other virtue they may have once possessed tend to be replaced with less desirable substitutes. For some time I have held the view that the one subclass of homo sapiens an honest man does not ever want to see in a position of any authority or influence is an ex-senator.
The exceptions are so few that they should be classified as aberrations.
I pondered it a while back...
Trust them or trust them to act in their nature?
Looks to me like act in their nature won out.
Total nonsense, fermenting out of your own mind.
Especially this:
The recusal was not strategic, it was not some part of 4-D chess, it was just Sessions defaulting to his DC insider persona.