No way he’s nailing AOC. BEARD!
How do American Commies get a SC?
What’s the difference? That motor mouth would tell him anything he wants to know, anyway.
I think the whole subject of security clearances and their importance or non-importance pretty much goes out the window when the Democrats are in charge of anything.
Debbie Wassermann-Schultz essentially let agents of a foreign intelligence agency run the computer network for the entire House of Representatives the last time they ran the place.
Clintoon famously had a staff full of un-cleared druggies..........
This was always my question regarding the “lawyers” HRC used to prune her email server.
There is definitely something odd going on here. I can’t speak to Congressional email policy, but in the DoD, government email account holders must have some sort of official status. The categories I am familiar with include:
-Military
-Allied military w/duty at a U.S. unit
-Appropriated fund civilian employee
-Non-appropriated fund civilian employee (positions authorized by the Congress, but funded through PX profits, MWR fees, etc...)
-Allied civilian working at a U.S. unit
-Local national U.S. government employees
-Officially sanctioned volunteers
Boyfriend isn’t on that list
Regrettably security clearances are priced at a penny per box of one hundred. Well maybe not that low a cost but most security clearances are manufactured these days. Generally nobody knows whom has the proper credentials and most claiming a security clearance have none. Just like me. The world really is a dangerous place
Yes. Issued by the central committee.
However it is apparently in violation of guidelines and/or regulations for the use of mail system to have email accounts created for spouses/family/friends.
I would bet you a decent lunch that this being the government, somewhere there is a form that has to be filled out requesting the account be created. That form would go to the IT department to create the account. It would be interesting to know if there is a specific question on that form relating to the person having need for the account and it being within guidelines/criteria for access. Because clearly someone is lying. Either the boyfriend is paid staff, and then marginally has need for the account, or he is not. If he is not, then someone lied - on a federal application/form. That's got to be worth a few lumps...