Two things spring up about the study. They are examining high school students and we all know there are sudden growth spurts involved. Why, those boys are spurting all over the place, every chance they get. Ha, ha. Seriously, though, are they studying fully mature subjects or jumping the gun, here.
Also, they are concentrating on one localized area. Have they factored in the genetic component by looking at ancestry and relationship? “Thanks a bunch, great-grandpa. 3.5? It’s a wonder that I’m even here.”
And, not that I want to know, are they measuring the boys “at rest” or are we talking about measurements in an aroused state? If the latter, have they considered who was taking the measurements? “Gee, Hillary, all your measurement data are coming in lower than the others’ results. Why is that?”
No rubbing or looking at porn prior to measurement pricedyres.
“are they measuring the boys “at rest” or are we talking about measurements in an aroused state?”
They also commented on semen quality, so I’m assuming arousal was involved.
“And, not that I want to know, are they measuring the boys “at rest” or are we talking about measurements in an aroused state?”
High school students, remember? There pretty much isn’t any “at rest”.
there mentions of semen and infertility or quality, I wonder did they sample same time every day they sampled? It’s known men can have more semen at some times more so then others and these teens may have done things (to put it nicely) that may have effected the samples (like when your doctor needs first urine of day but you already went at home prior to doctor appt, or doctor tells you to fast but you snitch before the blood test)