To: JoSixChip
Right. In this situation which would you rather — admit to a potential corruption felony, or merely incompetence? She’s clearly opted for the latter.
14 posted on
02/09/2019 10:52:00 AM PST by
Tallguy
To: Tallguy
"corruption felony, or merely incompetence?"It matters not. Both are felonies. She signed it. If you sign a bad check, it's a felony, whether you knew, or you should have known it was bad.
40 posted on
02/09/2019 11:24:31 AM PST by
norwaypinesavage
(Calm down and enjoy the ride, great things are happening for our country)
To: Tallguy
Right. In this situation which would you rather admit to a potential corruption felony, or merely incompetence? Shes clearly opted for the latter.
I don't know. One corruption charge? Or admit you don't read the legal documents you sign, implying the potential for her to have not read ANY OTHER DOCUMENTS she signed either! That certainly seems to open up quite a can of worms on every document she has fraudulently submitted, giving every single target she's been involved in the opportunity to show incorrect procedures in their legal proceedings. If there's even a question that their cases weren't properly handled, that's a lot of potential convictions/FISA stuff that could get tossed out!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson