@realDonaldTrump 6m6 minutes ago
Well, it happened again. Amy Klobuchar announced that she is running for President, talking proudly of fighting global warming while standing in a virtual blizzard of snow, ice and freezing temperatures. Bad timing. By the end of her speech she looked like a Snowman(woman)!
Anybody else see this around the net? It was posted on another thread.
O/T: Twitter thread said RBG was found unconscious in her home...
18 posted on 2/10/2019, 12:53:30 PM by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Trust the plan of the 17th letter of the English alphabet!!)
Thanks for the Q-tip. Trump is just hammering the Global Warming Libtards. Too funny.
:-)
Only problem is the liberals continually change the language. First it was global cooling, then warming, now it’s “climate change”. ...
dge Ho saves his best for last. He concludes:
Under our Constitution, contentious policy disputes are resolved by the people, through their elected representatives in Congress. And when a particular policy position garners enough support to leap the hurdles of Article I, Section 7, it becomes the law of the land.
For our system to work, however, we must share a common language. When the American people come to a consensus, there must be a way to reduce the agreement to words that we can all understand and accept—both today and in the years to come. We must have confidence that our words will be faithfully construed in the future, consistent with our common understanding.
That confidence is lost if the people undertake to debate difficult issues, accept the daunting task of forging compromise, and then reduce that compromise to legislation—only to have courts surprise the people with rulings that bear no resemblance to our common language. I agree with Judge Lynch that “we need to respect the choices made by Congress about which social problems to address, and how to address them.” Zarda, 883 F.3d at 166 (Lynch, J., dissenting). We should not “impos[e] on a half-century-old statute a meaning of ‘sex discrimination’ that the Congress that enacted it would not have accepted.” Hively, 853 F.3d at 357 (Posner, J., concurring).
https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2019/02/judge-ho-crushes-it.php