the hope that it will have any impact on the primaries appears to be your fairy tale. the guys that are peddling the nbc delusion are more rational right now that than the people pushing the amusing argument that the purveyors of the cheap sex party will reject someone because they practiced cheap sex.
As you appear to be semi-literate at the very best which might concievably said of you, and too damned lazy to search for the original articles and read them so you make unwarranted assumptions at the very least I will synopsize:
Kamala Harris is not a nice person. She sometimes does unwarranted things. Other people are the same way. Kamala Harris is not universally fawned over in California, she actually has made enemies.
Some of her enemies used to attend the same sorts of parties Willie Brown favored in the mid nineties, and they have video.
Those enemies are also people who wouldn’t be terribly upset if the public saw videos of them playing the beast with two backs when they were younger and attractive.
An article printed months ago detailed all of this and related threats by some of the people to release videos in which Harris could be seen as a participant. Not because she was a participant, but because they want to deliver a payback for whatever past transgression they believe she has done to them.
I read that article on this forum.
I don’t know what it is about youJohn Browdie which makes you desire to personalize relating previous articles, but you need help. You have an integrity problem. I related that I was not the source of what I posted, and you have doubled down on your insistence that I must have made this up.
Despite the fact that she was openly the mistress of a married man at the time this stuff happened, and this kind of thing goes with the territory when someone leads that life.