Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Heartlander
They cannot admit they judged a boy by his hat.

No, they judged him by his skin color.

21 posted on 01/25/2019 9:52:38 AM PST by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: 17th Miss Regt
They cannot admit they judged a boy by his hat.
No, they judged him by his skin color.
Neither is true. If the boy had been black and wearing a MAGA hat, he would have been as much a target, and more so. Ditto if it had been a woman.

So it is more true that they judged him by his hat. OTOH the real misjudgment, the real prejudice, lies in the judgment they made prior to that. Their prejudice is that they are the ones to decide - for all of us - the meaning of the hat.

The basis of that prejudice is their membership in a mutual admiration society. The club of objective journalists.

The ancient greek philosophers figured out that claiming to be wise was a slippery way of evading facts and logic. It was the propaganda of the sophists against whom the philosophers contended.

sophist
1542, earlier sophister (c.1380), from L. sophista, sophistes, from Gk. sophistes, from sophizesthai "to become wise or learned," from sophos "wise, clever," of unknown origin. Gk. sophistes came to mean "one who gives intellectual instruction for pay," and, contrasted with "philosopher," it became a term of contempt. Ancient sophists were famous for their clever, specious arguments.
philosopher
O.E. philosophe, from L. philosophus, from Gk. philosophos "philosopher," lit. "lover of wisdom," from philos "loving" + sophos "wise, a sage."

"Pythagoras was the first who called himself philosophos, instead of sophos, 'wise man,' since this latter term was suggestive of immodesty." [Klein]

Journalists are modern-day sophists, but they evade the odor of sophistry of claiming wisdom by claiming “objectivity” instead. Pretty much the same difference. And, if you pay attention you will notice that they don’t claim objectivity for themselves personally - they claim objectivity for the group first, and then for whoever else among them has been attacked for being ideological.

“Wisdom” and “objectivity” are aspirations, not states of being. It is arrogant to claim otherwise about yourself. Or to join a mutual admiration society which you know will claim either for you.


50 posted on 01/26/2019 9:36:12 AM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson