Two decades of the 'hockey stick' graph; Where are we today?

American Thinker ^ | 01/24/2019 | S. Fred Singer

[z3n]

Anyone with a minimal background in statistics and research would look at this stuff and dismiss it out of hand. The methodology is beyond embarrassing, it’s out and out fraud.

~~~

With climate change, other than the obscure research articles published scientific journals, anything you read is not real research or statistics. It’s all written for effect.

The climate has never been static. Ever. There are micro-cycles and macro-cycles, a millions of vectors of influence, most of which influence each other to varying degrees as well the ‘climate’ as a whole, and you could get buried infinitely in the minutia of all the feedback loops, counteracting phenomena, and ecological complexities.

What doesn’t change is, no matter what short term measurable phenomenon you can cite, it will always be attributed subjectively as a negative symptom of ‘climate change’.

[FLT-bird]

Hide the Decline.

[Intolerant in NJ]

The Deniers by Lawrence Solomon and Climate Change: The Facts edited by Alan Moran (including sections by the likes of Richard Lindzen and James Delingpole)are a couple of other books providing solid evidence debunking the man made global warming fantasy.......