Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: PeaRidge; DiogenesLamp; jeffersondem; StoneWall Brigade; FLT-bird; rockrr; BroJoeK; x; ...

Ping to you lovers of history.


3 posted on 01/23/2019 2:33:25 PM PST by rustbucket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: rustbucket

Thanks for the ping Rusty!


6 posted on 01/23/2019 2:49:42 PM PST by rockrr ( Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: rustbucket
I've read through the thread, and I have noticed the same ole same ole arguments being regurgitated again and again. As usual, everyone focuses on the trees instead of the forest.

I used to research this issue quite a lot, and I believe I have figured out exactly what happened, and why so many people became confused over the years about the meaning of "natural born citizen."

But before I get into any of that, the first thing I would ask people to do is to explain why the Colonies gave up the word "Subject", and thereafter used the word "Citizen."

Why did they do this? "Subject" was the normal term for all of their history. From whence did this "Citizen" word emerge?


115 posted on 01/24/2019 8:12:20 AM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson