Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ShadowAce

If the Linux faithful consider Microsoft Windows to be that bad, why do so many of these alternative environments look like they were ripped off from Microsoft?


15 posted on 01/23/2019 7:46:38 AM PST by bobcat62
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: bobcat62
If the Linux faithful consider Microsoft Windows to be that bad, why do so many of these alternative environments look like they were ripped off from Microsoft?

It's not the look and feel of the environment that is bad--it's the company behind it and the technology under it that is unpleasant.

16 posted on 01/23/2019 7:48:05 AM PST by ShadowAce (Linux - The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: bobcat62
Motif on HP/UX looked nothing like MS-Windows in the before times. Any ‘similarity’ is simply the GUI version of parallel evolutionary paths. Eyes for example have been tried different ways and re engineered numerous times in biological history. A desktop with graphical folders in a neat clean layout is a good solid time-tested paradigm, just like having legs is good for locomotion on land.
19 posted on 01/23/2019 7:58:25 AM PST by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson