Posted on 01/15/2019 5:00:29 PM PST by MtnClimber
One way to understand the Democratic opposition to the judicial nomination of Brian Buescher over his membership in the Catholic group the Knights of Columbus is as a test run in preventing their worst nightmare: the confirmation of Judge Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court.
Democratic senators Kamala Harris (Calif.) and Mazie Hirono (Hawaii) targeted Buescher during his confirmation hearing and in written questions late last year, suggesting that his Catholic beliefs would lead him to rule against abortion rights, as well as that his membership in the Knights could be enough to disqualify him from serving as a judge at all. Hirono went so far as to demand that he drop his membership and recuse himself from any case on which the organization has taken a position.....
In raising a similar fuss over Bueschers nomination, Democrats have revealed the basis of their strategy for what surely will be an all-out campaign to stop Coney Barrett from being seated on the Supreme Court, should President Trump have the chance to make another nomination and should he choose the Seventh Circuit judge.
(Excerpt) Read more at nationalreview.com ...
When you’re fighting Satanists, there are no rules.
A Muslim constitutuionalist would rule that there are no such constitutional rights.
That should be DEMONIC Senators Harris and Hirono.
The communists better start gearing up for Judge Thomas’ replacement as well... Both will most likely happen this year... He will not take a chance on the 2020 election results... He will not be stupid like RBG was...
” They’d slander Jesus Christ himself over their cheap tawdry politics... Oh wait, they already do.”
You’ve picked the “Wrong Jesus!” Their “guy” is Jesus Montoya, their gardener and his illegal alien family. All those who are named Jesus are not created “equal!”
Two men say they're Jesus, one of 'em must be wrong.
“Two men say they’re Jesus, one of ‘em must be wrong.”
One of them pronounces his name “Heysooose!” He’s the impostor!
>>>If someone were to appoint a genuinely observant Muslim to the SCOTUS, how would that Justice rule on gay rights and abortion??? <<<
It is perfectly acceptable for infidels to have abortions though sadly it will leave less of them for them to kill later on.
The democrats have no love for the bill of rights. It’s freedom from religion, or separation of Church and the world
I know whomever gets the nod (to replace RBG) will go through a televised root canal. Horrible. Who the heck would want the job?
That is the intent and purpose of the motherf&$# rat party. To drive out every person who doesnt follow their party line to the letter.
That is all the Democrats need before the 2020 elections. Alienate the female vote.
Not exactly trying to hide their contempt for the Christian religions are they?
That is the exact implication of the Kavenaugh hearing - POTUS confers with the Majority Leader, who assures confers with the caucus. The Majority Leader gives POTUS assurance that the nominee whom the two of them agreed on will get an expeditious vote. POTUS then names the nominee - and the Senate votes.Otherwise, who will accept a nomination to any judicial appointment?
I remember it well. How the dems can claim any sort of morality after rejecting God at their convention is beyond me.
Their “morality” is like filthy rags to the Lord.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.