Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kamala Harris birth time line
Various; see below | Jan 10, 2019 | upchuck

Posted on 01/10/2019 6:25:52 PM PST by upchuck

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last
To: Lurkinanloomin
"Natural born citizens are NATURALLY citizens because they cannot be anything else."

No, that's what birthers like to pretend it means. It doesn't. If you are born in the US you are citizen by right of birth. You are a natural born citizen. End of story.

41 posted on 01/10/2019 8:43:48 PM PST by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Blue House Sue

Asian?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kamala_Harris

Kamala Harris was born on October 20, 1964, in Oakland, California, to a Tamil Indian mother and a Jamaican father. Her mother, Shyamala Gopalan Harris, was a breast cancer scientist who immigrated to the US from Madras (now Chennai) in 1960.[3][4] Her father, Donald Harris, is a Stanford University economics professor who immigrated from Jamaica in 1961 for graduate study in economics at University of California, Berkeley.[


42 posted on 01/10/2019 8:49:32 PM PST by Freedom56v2 (#KATE'SWALL Build it Now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

It will be intersting to see Lieawatha and Harris argue over who is the better liar.


43 posted on 01/10/2019 9:30:04 PM PST by seawolf101 (Member LES DEPLORABLES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

It won’t matter. People have tried this before. No court will do anything

Put your energies towards real issues


44 posted on 01/10/2019 9:41:06 PM PST by Nifster (II see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

In no way is she a natural born citizen, divided loyalties at birth.

Citizen yes, natural born citizen; no.

Americans need to stand up to this all out assault on the natural born clause. We had Obama, and directly after, who did the republicans try to run? That’s right, a field packed with candidates that were not natural born citizens.

The powers that be are trying very hard to kill this clause, we would do well to keep it.


45 posted on 01/10/2019 9:56:11 PM PST by walkingdead (It's easy, you just don't lead 'em as much....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

Therefore Kamala could not have been a US citizen at the time of her birth because neither of her parents could have been US citizens at the time of her birth.


1. Whaaaat? Yes, you can be a citizen at birth even if your parent is not.

2. Obama never was a citizen or legal resident. He had absolutely NO USA documentation until he served in the US senate. So why would anyone care?


46 posted on 01/10/2019 9:59:25 PM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind the Blue Wall
There isn’t a practical way to handle the natural born citizenship clause other than to interpret it as “citizenship at birth”.

Well practical or not your interpretation is moronic.

47 posted on 01/10/2019 10:36:07 PM PST by itsahoot (Welcome to the New USA where Islam is a religion of peace and Christianity is a mental disorder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin
Through a misinterpretation of the 14th Amendment all children born here are given citizenship.

It wan't even a decision, merely a comment attached to a decision that has no legal effect whatsoever.

48 posted on 01/10/2019 10:38:01 PM PST by itsahoot (Welcome to the New USA where Islam is a religion of peace and Christianity is a mental disorder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

I mentioned on a thread a few months ago that she was not eligible to be a candidate for POTUS, because both parents were foreign nationals. ...(Like Jindal and Haley)

You provided much more data with the dates. Good job!

We failed regarding Obama, but must prove for sure that she doesn’t qualify to even run.


49 posted on 01/10/2019 11:01:47 PM PST by octex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blue House Sue

They better!

Obama was 50% white, 30% Arab and 20% black, with all of his records sealed and a phony SS# that was originally assigned to a man in CT.

The left drummed up the “birther” meme and scared everyone away. ....Look at the damages done in his 8-year “reign”!
America can’t stand a repeat of that disaster.


50 posted on 01/10/2019 11:15:12 PM PST by octex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mlo

Ok, so what is the difference between phrases “citizen at birth” and “natural born citizen”.


51 posted on 01/10/2019 11:51:43 PM PST by nosf40
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Freedom56v2

“Asian?”

India is in Asia.


52 posted on 01/11/2019 5:06:50 AM PST by Blue House Sue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Blue House Sue

It might have been more clear to say she is half Black and half Indian, a clearer definition of her race/ethnicity. If I said think of a Black-Asian American, many might think of Tiger Woods...

I am aware of the geographic location of India and fact that on census bureau, Indians are Asian. However, for the most part, Indians in United States prefer to be referred to as Indians...and Americans reserve term “Asian” for people from the Far East.\

Given the recent increased influx of immigrants from India, Pakistan, and China, and their impact on STEM jobs, I hope the census will redefine some of these sub-groups so there is a better idea of who is entering the country.

https://www.quora.com/Do-Indians-like-to-be-called-Asians-or-are-they-really-from-an-Asian-ethnicity

https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/153890/why-dont-americans-refer-to-indians-and-others-from-the-subcontinent-as-asian


53 posted on 01/11/2019 7:24:57 AM PST by Freedom56v2 (#KATE'SWALL Build it Now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
The problem is that nothing in the Constitution actually defines "natural born citizen" so people now accept "born in this country" as good enough.

I know they're wrong regarding the founder's intent, but there is no ironclad law to stop them so la-di-da she'll go skipping merrily along.

That's the reality. The politicians are not on our side, the courts are not on our side and they decide. No serious challenge to her eligibility will be acknowledged.

She's more likely to get heat for sleeping her way into her position than anything else.

54 posted on 01/11/2019 8:45:55 AM PST by dead (Our next president is going to be sooooo boring.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nosf40
"Ok, so what is the difference between phrases “citizen at birth” and “natural born citizen”."

What makes you think there is a difference?

55 posted on 01/11/2019 12:16:37 PM PST by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson