The University derps call that “intersectionality”.
____________________________________
So the Deep State thinks Trump is about to declare a National Security Emergency and wants to leverage such a declaration into protests/riots. But will that be enough?
They decided to “prime the pump” by releasing the WP story suggesting that POTUS is attacking civil rights and then wait to fan the flames when he declares a national emergency. Nancy and Chucky show up dressed in their riot-inciting best. But DARN! POTUS doesn’t declare! In fact, he chips away at their base by focusing on humanitarian crisis they created! They did NOT have speeches prepared for that. And they’re afraid what’s going to happen to them if they can’t get a riot going ASAP (tick tock).
Now what? Launch Plan B. The 4 am article (literally the release time - so it was already “tee-d up” for the green light) by ABC “news” detailing a rumor that Rosenstein is leaving should get the riots going, they hope. That “rumor” doesn’t have to be true, it just has to provide sufficient “fear” to provoke protests/riots. If it doesn’t happen that RR leaves, they can claim their protesting/rioting stopped POTUS in his tracks (i.e., stopped him from forcing RR out).
Sadly, I believe that the DS deems such protests “necessary” to collect people into soft target zones. Hire Antifa or MS13 or other henchmen to attack the “peaceful protesters” and make the false optics look like POTUS is suppressing civil rights protests.
In providing false flag events blamed on POTUS, the DS might hope to chip away at Trump’s base (e.g., “Yeah so you’re conservative, but you object to Macron abusing yellow vest protesters so you’ll object attacks on protesters we’ll blame on POTUS, right? Right?” If true, I grimly suppose that such false flags would be designed to be severe/graphic.
So my tin foil slants in the direction of a battle for the base going on- with Trump addressing alot of walk-away Dems and fence sitters, and the DS trying to reach Trump supporters with false portrayals of Macron-like (yellow vest) protester suppression.
Calling your legislator: A step-by-step guide
Call congressional offices directly or through the switchboard. If you do not have the direct number, you can reach US representatives by calling 202-225-3121, and US senators by calling 202-224-3121. Ask the operator to connect you to the individual office. If you do not know the names of your members of Congress or want the direct line to their office, you can find your senators here and your representative here.
https://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm
Or house.gov
Ask to speak to the aide who handles the issue about which you are calling. Your call will be more influential if you speak to the correct aide. However, Congressional aides are very busy and this is not always possible. If you cannot speak directly with the aide, leave a message with the receptionist stating your views.
Let them know that you are a constituent. Elected officials are most interested in your opinions if you are their constituent, so be sure to say the city and state you are from.
Know your facts. Be sure you have the basic information about your topic in front of you when you call. You should be able to specifically describe the topic about which you are calling and state your opinion on what your legislator should do.
Note your expertise. If you have professional experience on the issue on which you are calling, be sure to mention it. It will help to establish your credibility on the issue and may event prompt the aide to ask you for some guidance on the issue.
Be brief. Aides receive a high volume of phone calls every day, so keep your call short.
Be timely. Timeliness is especially important when you are phoning. If the vote on your issue is imminent, the aide is much more likely to pay attention to what you say.
Consider calling the local office. Calling the office in your district or state, rather than the Washington office, can sometimes be very effective. If you are calling about a vote or other timely issues, always call the Washington office. But, if you are calling generally about an issue that affects your district or community, calling the local office can be a good way to make them aware of an issue.
1. That it was about 60-70% of what was needed in terms of calling a spade a spade.
2. Laying out SOME slightly to moderately stark humanitarian facts in such a methodical clincal way was good for clarity and as an abstract.
3. And there was SOME slight attempt to drive it home in personal terms by asking what if it were your daughter etc.
4. However, it was still rather tidy as a package of information. And part of the result of it being such a tidy packet of information was that it was easy to diminish the horror of what he was really talking about.
5. Even POTUS' usual fiery passion was largely neutered by his reading the teleprompter so methodically.
6. I don't think it kindled much fire in the hearts of many even supporters. They may have gone "Right on!" or "Yeah, that's sure true." But I wonder how many rose up, stood up (at least inside) and sort of screamed "And we're not gonna take it any more."
7. Am going to write on the White House website email form that he needs to b*tch-slap the populace awake--particularly regarding:
8. A) The horrific baby, toddler, child sex abuse where even babies are RAPED--make it graphic--maybe a specific case or 2; cite stats.
B) The outrageous satanic sacrifice, dismembering of babies, toddlers & others; cite stats even if only estimates.
C) The hideous entry of children, women & others into literal slavery in AMERICA! Cite stats, and a personal case or 2.
D) The organ harvesting of hapless victims--many who had family members sacrifice to pay huge sums to get them across the border only to have them tortured, raped, & their organs harvested.
E) More vivid details and examples of MS13 gang members murdering, raping, torturing
F) More vivid details of veterans and LEO's being murdered, tortured, by MS13 & Jihadi illegals.
9. I think he MUST make every father & mother; aunt & uncle; brother & sister be concerned that they and/or their loved one ARE seriously at increasing risk without the border wall.
10. I think he MUST make it clear that the oligarchy is working hard to destroy our Republic and the families & lives of the average middle and lower classed citizens--usually as brutally as possible.
How many of you agree, more or less?
What interesting times.... that’s really thinking ahead (sad and scary to say, your thoughts are within my tin foil range, too). Tragic that we can imagine such a terrible, malevolent DS.
...we need to stay in prayer!! (Understatement)