Replies

I have never followed Q, even when I was a “believer” in the “trust Sessions.” Not saying anything about Q, just never followed. But if you read Huber’s charge a year ago from Sessions, nowhere was it stated he was brought in to investigate. He was brought in as a logistics guy, to see if any cases needed “additional resources.”

I refer everyone to the supposed Grand Jury investigating the Clintons in Little Rock, a grand jury I proved the existence of with a communication from the office of the GJ itself-—of course they couldn’t tell me what they were looking at.

BUT, I did look at Little Rock papers. There were several high-profile drug busts and 60 sealed indictments. Nothing to do with the Clintons. Later, the prosecutor unsealed 30 of the 60-—ALL gun related charges. Now, if you’ve got drug busts, and half the sealed indicts were gun busts, you can pretty well be sure the other 30 are drugs.

YES, I agree, there was a plane taking boxes of (supposed) evidence out of Little Rock. This should be a much bigger cause for concern, in that a LR GJ was much more likely to be a place that would issue an indictment of Cankles. If they took the evidence back to DC, it wasn’t to prosecute but to bury it.

Rush Limbaugh had this right from the get go. Mulehead is there to cover up and sanitize everything related to Zero and Cankles. McCabre is in front of a GJ for lying to congress-—and you’ll recall Congress made a criminal referral on him. Has Congress made a criminal referral on anyone else? Nope. Nor will they now that Botoxic is back in charge.

Thanks for your detailed response, LS.

On your suggestion, I re-read Sessions’ March 29, 2018 letter to Grassley, Goodlatte and Gowdy where he confirms the appointment of Huber.

I DO NOT read the letter as limiting Huber to making recommendations only. I read that section, and the Letter as a whole, as being a deflection of specific requests from the Senator and Congressmen for appointment of a second Special Counsel.

The reasons for Sessions not wanting to appoint a second SC are many; but, the best one I can think of is that they already have a more direct path to the desired goals, and do not want another chef in the kitchen, potentially spoiling the broth.

Of course, it could be that Sessions is really compromised, and is defending the deep state ... or that Sessions and Trump are just village idiots ... but I do not believe either of those things and I doubt that you do either.

FWIW, LS, I think you were closer to the truth early on, when you were one of the first ... perhaps even before Q ... to postulate a deeper plan, a BIGGER PLAN, for Trump’s counterattack against the deep state and the attempted coup d’état.

I have never followed Q,

Maybe you should.

Has Congress made a criminal referral on anyone else? Nope.

Pay strict attention to the following.

This is what's commonly known as a CRIMINAL REFERRAL from Congress. Note the names referred. Also note the addressees. One of them is Huber. You know, the guy you say isn't charged with investigation/prosecution.

#1683

Congress Refers Comey, Clinton, Lynch, McCabe, Strzok & Page for Criminal Investigation

Q
!CbboFOtcZs
24 Jul 2018 - 9:38:59 AM

You have more than you know.

https://gosar.house.gov/uploadedfiles/criminal-referral.pdf

See LS? Following Q does have it's benefits. How did YOU of all people not know about this referral?

The thing is, and with all due respect, you don't know as much as you think you know.

I say this with all due respect because some people around here seem to think you are some kind of insider that has all the answers, and I don't want to offend them *cough* bitt *cough*.

Thing is, we're tapped into a REAL insider who is all the way inside, not just on the periphery.

So anyway, I'm curious as to your response to this document after you having said Congress has made no criminal referrals other than McCabe.

My advice to you, goodman, is to pay attention to Q. Knowledge can be gained from all sources. Hell, I read your stuff.

Bagster