Replies

So, if I support Q and get followers, that proves your point. If I attack Q and get followers, that proves your point.

Marxist logic in the extreme. You still won’t devise just one simple test we can all agree on. At least Draw and Strike did that. He said that he’d “eat crow” if there weren’t arrests right after Sessions resigned. There weren’t. He dropped the “stealthjeff” from his twitter handle, but otherwise hasn’t “eaten any crow.”

So, if I support Q and get followers, that proves your point. If I attack Q and get followers, that proves your point.

You misunderstand. You reject Q because he HAS a following. One that you think should rightfully be yours. Because YOU set yourself up as an "insider" (like you just did with the 'I know a guy at Gitmo').

Its the insider status that you covet, and Q threatens that. He being a true "insider", and you a shadow of that.

It comes down to simple jealousy, which I do understand.

You still won’t devise just one simple test we can all agree on.

And I won't. There isn't one. There are no "simple tests" in this. Its bigger than that. Its far from simple, and its puzzling that you can't see it.

I've said before, we can still lose this fight. You have to see the back and forth as the derps struggle and use all their entrenched weaponry.

So, yea. We win, or we lose. There are no tests and no fixed dates for each event. There are plans and reactions to those plans and counter-plans.

Please stop with the straw-men.

Bagster

At least Draw and Strike did that.

Wondering why you think I (or anybody else) should give a S-word about "Draw and Strike" and what he thinks.

He, like you and me, is just a dude.

Bagster