Replies

RR testified that the FISA he signed is not what has been suggested or discussed in the media. TBD ;)

It is a given in conventional wisdom and CTH and other outlets that the 4th FISA is/was a further fraud and that RR is DS etc., etc. That all may be ... but things in this realm are near always + certainly not as they appear. Those that follow these threads know I flip & flop about the roles of RR and the Mule and to this day I'm still uncertain ... except of one thing - RR was never hauled before congress to testify when that window was open. That suggests to me that RR is more helpful to the white hats then not ... and that gets to the "Q" admonition that if RR is bad, then the mule is bad, or vice-versa. I've come to conclude they are leveraged in one way or another and even if/as POTUS was misled or errant when meeting with RR & the Mule before he was appointed SC or if they're rogue or compromised, prudence dictates treating them as uncertain. Otherwise there are wild cards in the picture ... but I believe it was Gowdy who said that anybody who has seen the 4th FISA would know what's happening here. Though that line of thinking has led me to believe the 4th FISA has bogus things but RR's testimony suggests otherwise. It's quite the movie!