We have a few things that we're not supposed to discuss here, JFK Jr. among them. This thread is for discussion, and not just Q stuff makes the cut. I suggest that your object stems more from someone using a Biblical reference to talk about "not bible stuff".
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Actually, no.
I guess I can see how you might interpret my answer that way; but, I do not recall ever objecting to persons interpreting the Bible as applicable to current events.
I know there are others who may feel that way, or who simply prefer to leave out the Bible altogether ... but that is not me.
My objection is to "endorsing" (by placing at the top of the thread) additional non-Q third-party (i.e., non-FReeQ) sources. Personally, I would stop at praying medic if any.
I don't know if you have noticed, but in my prior posts I also object to pasting the Q posts with non-Q "Titles" that come from some aggregator sites.
Of course, no one else seems to be bothered by this, so I post my criticism and move on.
No outside comms.