“You didn’t think the largest MIL spending bill in history (FY 2019) wasn’t going to [indirectly] include funding for the wall did you? Learn the Constitution re: vested powers of POTUS re: matters of NAT SEC. This was planned and forecasted as the ‘border funding’ solution from the beginning.”
_________________
I have thought that the MIL spending bill would be used to cover the wall and that the current strife with the Democrats refusal is to highlight DEMS unwillingness to commit funds to a wall which many Americans want. And what manager wouldn’t want to at least see if they could get money for the wall? :/
>>And what manager wouldn’t want to at least see if they could get money for the wall?
An excellent point and one that should pop to the top of assumptions.