Replies

Recent research has shown that the conception of Jesus was on Sept. 3, 3 BC, when Virgo had the sun in her hair with the crescent moon at her feet. The best evidence is that Herod died on December 29, 1 BC, during a total lunar eclipse of the moon, not in 4 BC as the consensus of the experts have claimed. On June 17, 2 BC, Jesus was born when Venus and Jupiter merged in the sky, an event that has not occurred previous or since. Jupiter performed a triple conjunction around the central star Regulus, in the constellation Leo the Lion. On Dec. 25, 2 BC, Jupiter stopped its prograde motion in its third trip over the top of Regulus, the heart of Leo. On that day Jupiter sat still over Bethlehem to the South, as viewed from Jerusalem. Jupiter had stopped its prograde motion of its triple conjunction above Regulus, forming a triple crown. Jupiter’s motion would become retrograde, against the motion of the stars. This is the most likely time when the wisemen visited Jesus, Dec. 25, 2 BC, when Jesus was a toddler.

30 years later Jesus began to preach to Good News of the Gospel. On Friday, April 3, 33 AD, Jesus laid down His life for us. The full moon rose that night engulfed in a total lunar eclipse (a blood moon), representing a full life lived with a sacrifice. Remember that Jesus was born during a crescent moon, a full life yet to be lived. Jesus rose again victorious on the third day after His death. If you project the eclipse of the moon on April 3, 33 AD, back onto the sky towards the sun, you will find that it points to Aries the Ram, the Lamb of God, sacrificed for the sin of the world.

-Frank

Totally agree with what you posted, well almost, I'll get with you about that in a minute.
I've been reading this information for about 30 years now, you would think by now this information would be common knowledge especially since the redateing of when they thought King Herod died. The fact that it hasn't become common knowledge is proof that the Dec 25th date is still promoted mainly because the big God of the cultural Christianity and Humanism is
"...........TRADITION..........."
TRADITION is so big it rolls it's eye at any proof that Jesus was born any other day then the Dec 25th day and ignores any other proof because people really don't care about details. People would rather stick with the TRADITION of the Dec 25th date because to do so would require them to study the Bible for specific details instead of speed reading it every year, and/or study history, and/or study astronomy which is boring. They would rather believe that God created a bright star out of no where instead of God ordaining the arrangement of the stars and planets before the beginning of time(the doctrine of ordination and predestination) because it is hard for them to preceive the idea that God actually had a plan before the beginning of time, before he created heaven and earth, and before he created Adam and Eve. They would rather believe that God creates history as he goes along or after he created the heavens and the earth, and Adam and Eve. Well anyway I've gotten off on a tangent now and need to end this part of my comment.
To get back to where I disagree with you somewhat, I've heard various dates on when Jesus was born from the same time period. I've seen dates from Aug 19th 3BC to Sept 11 3BC. I haven't study it in detail as to narrow it down beyond that. I kind of believe that eventually there will be a consensus among Christians that study astrology, and they will narrow it down even further then the various dates they say it happened.