Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: rey

Proposition 65 is absurdly restrictive. It was in part (in part, I said, not solely) devised to destroy the nutritional supplementation industry, in deference to the FDA and Big Pharma.

Natural substances contain trace amounts of lead, among other things. Unnatural pharmaceuticals do not - unless they are designed to do so, like some past mercury-based vaccines.

Just as with CFLs, if it serves some Big Industry, especially one favorable to Obama and company, it gets a pass.
G


33 posted on 12/25/2018 4:38:17 PM PST by YogicCowboy ("I am not entirely on anyone's side, because no one is entirely on mine." - J. R. R. Tolkien)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: YogicCowboy

G = typo.

P.S.

Many products and some entire companies in the nutritional market were effectively forced off the market by 65.


34 posted on 12/25/2018 4:40:34 PM PST by YogicCowboy ("I am not entirely on anyone's side, because no one is entirely on mine." - J. R. R. Tolkien)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson