>>Sundance is jealous of Q; wants to BE Q.
I’ve never seen a single instance of that, but perhaps you’re using hyperbole. What I’ve seen is Sundance working with a general theory of Trump and fitting what he sees into that framework. And it’s a good theory and makes for some fascinating conclusions. Sundance has developed a rather brilliant theory of Trump’s Foreign Policy as based completely on economics. Sundance gets fuzzier when he goes outside that box, and he’s as skeptical an analyzer as I’d hope he’d be. But there are some basic assumptions which he doesn’t accept about Q, and that puts him at odds with some of our conclusions. But if we turn up our nose at Sundance’s research and ignore him, then it seems we’re violating our mission as researchers that Q has set us.
Not going to turn my nose up at Sundance....or anybody, for that matter.
All I'm doing is reading/listening/watching
and
then
verify
everything
#BestExcuseForLurking
Sundance has a variety of theories, many well thought out. For the last two years he had a Q like version of events which he titled The Big Ugly, essentially saying that trump was working with sessions, Wray and rosenstein, struck, preistap, Huber and Horowitz to investigate And prosecute the cabal.
Last month sundance came out and stated he was wrong. He said there is no evidence that any of the above mentioned people were doing anything except obstructing trump. He went on to state “there is no Q, in military intelligence or anywhere else working with Trump, there is no Plan, there are not 60k sealed indictments, there is no Trust Sessions, and Huber is not conducting any criminal investigations.” Unquote.
Of course this didn’t surprise any of us that have never bought into the Plan. What is amazing is that Sundance repudiated totally Not only the Q thing but his own Big Ugly Plan which pretty much was the Q theory under a different name.