Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: MNDude

The Democrats and MSNBC crowd will bitch about this. But it’s perfectly legal, for the Commander in Chief, to deploy defense resources in this manner, isn’t it?

Democrats are really absurd sometimes. Like we hear Chuck Schumer say we don’t need a wall, but he says we need border security.

He’s all in favor of some ill defined concept of border security, but opposes a wall as part of said border security.

Democrats say they want free and fair elections, secure election processes, yet opposed voter ID.

They say they want every child to get a quality education, but oppose various reforms in that area to help make it happen.

It’s like in the abstract, they say they are in favor of various concepts, but oppose key changes in policies which would help promote said concepts.


12 posted on 12/19/2018 12:56:44 PM PST by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Dilbert San Diego
[The Dems] ...say they say they are in favor of various concepts, but oppose key changes in policies which would help promote said concepts.

Yes, they have this deceit thingy down pretty well.

19 posted on 12/19/2018 1:00:52 PM PST by Seaplaner (Never give in-never, never,never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Dilbert San Diego

” Like we hear Chuck Schumer say we don’t need a wall, but he says we need border security.”

Their idea of border security is not tampering with it and leaving it exactly as it is, secure from any restoration, expansion or strengthening.

Kind of like national security which in their eyes isn’t for the nation as a whole, but for the protection of the national GOVERNMENT and its agents, citizens be damned.


40 posted on 12/19/2018 1:11:25 PM PST by Califreak (Take Me Back To Constantinople)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Dilbert San Diego
Democrats are really absurd sometimes. Like we hear Chuck Schumer say we don’t need a wall, but he says we need border security.

He’s all in favor of some ill defined concept of border security, but opposes a wall as part of said border security.

The Democrats are all in for an expanded government, imported naturalized voters, and a generation or two of birth-right citizen voters. It's a race-to-the-bottom plan to grab the biggest piece of a shrinking pie. As long as, their piece is the biggest for a while.

Do you remember when, in the GWB years, a fence was authorized in law, but no money was ever authorized for its construction? Or, how much empty talk there was about the electronic "virtual fence?"

It's clear that the Dems will make some sops toward border security, such as increased patrol personnel from time to time, but don't want to do anything effective.

As I said, it's part of a larger plan: Look at the vote harvesting initiative actually made legal in CA, or the National Popular Vote Initiative to effectively over-ride the Electoral College and make the last corrupt district the winner-take-all player in Presidential elections.

62 posted on 12/19/2018 1:26:47 PM PST by Pearls Before Swine ( "It's always a party when you're eating the seed corn.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson