Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Rona Badger

“The Court therefore GRANTS 51 defendant’s motion for leave to file document under seal.”

Flynn is asking that it be sealed, not Mueller. Also, it sounds like the judge is referencing the docs already presented by Mueller. I don’t see anything about the first 302 from right after Flynn’s interview that everyone is up in the air about and wanting to see.

It is a bit confusing to sort out...


1,040 posted on 12/17/2018 3:13:22 PM PST by SaxxonWoods (The internet has driven the world mad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1038 | View Replies ]


To: SaxxonWoods

I’m not sure this is clarifying anything. SOMETHING has to have been seen since the judge says the redaction is okay.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/12/boom-jude-emerson-orders-mueller-to-release-original-302-report-on-flynn-interrogation-on-eve-of-sentencing/

Judge Emmett Sullivan is demanding Special Counsel Robert Mueller to release the original 302 report from the Michael Flynn interrogation in January 2017.

The original 302 report is still missing!
Mueller HAS NOT turned it over!


1,053 posted on 12/17/2018 3:44:09 PM PST by mairdie (Christmas music videos - http://www.iment.com/maida/tv/songvids/xmassong.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1040 | View Replies ]

To: SaxxonWoods

Aha, so “defendant” means Gen. Flynn; I thought it meant Mueller. So any legal docs Flynn has are called 302s as well? I thought a 302 was just the notes Feebs make when interviewing/interrogating someone.


1,056 posted on 12/17/2018 3:55:53 PM PST by little jeremiah (When we do not punish evildoers we are ripping the foundations of justice from future generations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1040 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson