He is not unemployed! The author of that headline took us for fools. He is receiving more money than me, and is not paying taxes on it.
Unemployed implies poor. Designed to pull at our sympathy strings. Won’t work with me.
Besides, he’s on pot, so he gets no sympathy from me, and I condemn him for using this money to smoke pot. He’s a useless lowlife living off money from stupid suckers. About the stupid suckers - what a bunch of a$$holes!
You can always ask me what I think, and you’ll get a straight answer.
Do you think if I went on TV and asked for money I would get rivers of money from stupid suckers? I don’t smoke pot, I drink an infinitesimally small amount of alcohol, and don’t wear a chain around my neck. Oh, and I’m not the right race to pull off this scam.
Is he a registered charity? If not, he's broken another law right there.
He is not unemployed! The author of that headline took us for fools. He is receiving more money than me, and is not paying taxes on it.
...
Actually the author does a good job of saying that he provides entertainment or fulfills other emotional needs for the people who donate.
Although, some of the people who donate may get a nasty surprise if they think their gifts are tax deductible.
There is a woman standing on the corner at our Walmart store begging for help. She has been there for months.
Not far away is a group that helps people down on their luck, all she has to do is walk in.
Time to bring back the Vagrancy laws of the 1960s.
This guy is a piker, there are far worse thieves who have been doing worse for over 50 years
Happens every day, and they steal from some of the poorest and most vulnerable in the USA, the elderly.
The con artists?
Televangelists, radio and TV preachers.
They make this guy look like a saint.