[MileHi]

But the Q-drop tries to make it sound like we could keep 3 (not 4) carrier groups on station in the western Pacific all the time,

Except the Q drop said no such thing. So you made something up and the argued that what you made up proved Q was a LARP. Really weak sauce, but I see that's all you have.

[Enigo54]

It’s what NPC’s do.

[Trump_the_Evil_Left]

You lack basic reading comprehension, like most/all of the people on these Q threads. You guys hide behind the fact that Q is frequently vague and frequently pushes his points in the form of questions, so when challenged you/Q can pretend there was not any actual assertion.

In this case, the "transition" referred to with North Korea is clearly ongoing (and far from finished yet). It was not some "transition" for 3 days in Nov. '17. The "transition" has been ongoing for 13+ months now.

Yet, Q said (oh, excuse me, ASKED) the 4 carrier battle groups were deployed for 3 days "to prevent other state actors from harming us during this transition." Q's drop was b.s. and if you can't see that then you are not able to discuss these matters intelligently. That goes for all of you on these Q threads. Q was pretending to have some important comment on US military strategy and deployments, but he showed he is just a web LARPer.

=======================================================

{Q said}:

Four carriers & escorts in the pacific?

Why is that relevant?

To prevent other state actors from attempting to harm us during this transition? Russia / China?

Or conversely all for NK? Or all three.