Asking for copies is not the same thing as having lost copies.
Has anybody even seen ANY evidence that ANYBODY said that they "lost" copies or evidence?
Or is them asking for copies proof that they "lost copies"?
Its my understanding that one witness is the guy that said Huber "lost copies twice" because they asked for two other sets of copies. Was he told by Huber's people that they "lost copies"? That seems unlikely. Think about it.
This guy made that up in his head. And now the derps (and a lot of dopes on FR) are running with it. Sometimes people don't think before they open their yaps. What is likely? What are the logical possibilities?
This is media, derp, troll, and ignorant spin. Also, what is the long term advantage for the derps if Huber really did "lose" copies. What's gonna happen is gonna happen, regardless.
This "lost evidence" is nothing but food for trolls and dummies like we saw on that thread yesterday to somehow say Huber is deep state, incompetent, or whatever.
Short term pleasure and snivel grist.
As they say, there is no "there" there.
p.s. Nothing can stop what is coming.
Nothing.
p.p.s. Trolls, Huber didn't show cause there are CRIMINAL investigations happening. Also, you don't give evidence of a criminal investigation to leaky sieve Congress. That would be like handing over your evidence and plans to the suspects and the media. Very simple, really.
These peoples are stupit.
And yes, I mean you trolls too.
Bagster