Posted on 12/10/2018 10:18:07 PM PST by ransomnote
Q post #2566.
I'd totally like to know if this is one of the guys that ended up dead. I wonder if this is the facility. If it is, chances are good that he's dead. There can't be that many people there, for one.
And it can't be that hard for the derps to track down who it is and whack him to send a message. And, pretty easy to get away with it, I'd reckon.
But then, I'm a suspicious guy. And I put nothing past the derps.
Nothing.
Bagster
Aaaaaaand....
The photo twank photo from “chooky” had him pointing to the QA around 8pm...right in the middle of the QA on chan.
Fourth, at least, off the top of my head.
Obama, Hillary, Rubio, Graham.
Wait, fifth. I meant fifth.
Bagster
Annnnnd we may learn something else later from POTUS about the true inner meaning of COVFEFE. LOL!
Well, Im all ears... !!! (Not surprised there might be another layer to this...)
Yes, that was it.
-SB
This one is still open. I dont know the title of the pulled thread.
I do know pal started this to try and get us closed down.
Can I say poop?
POOP! POOP! POOP!
#PaladinIsAPoopyHead
#INeedARideToTheMall
#Poop
Very nice FAQ’s!
Should you add: “Is the world flat?”
Just kiddin’!
Ahhhhh, another Qooker with an inability to grasp reality...or just a typical low IQ mind numbed robot.
To personally attack me on a 1-letter typo while ignoring the substance of my post is not only horribly weak intellectually but indicative of a Alinsky leftist.
Sad...an adult with the emotional behaviour of a 5y/o child.
Buh-Bye, Qook!
Your argument might be more effective without all the projection, name calling and alinsky like ad hominems.
Asking for copies is not the same thing as having lost copies.
Has anybody even seen ANY evidence that ANYBODY said that they "lost" copies or evidence?
Or is them asking for copies proof that they "lost copies"?
Its my understanding that one witness is the guy that said Huber "lost copies twice" because they asked for two other sets of copies. Was he told by Huber's people that they "lost copies"? That seems unlikely. Think about it.
This guy made that up in his head. And now the derps (and a lot of dopes on FR) are running with it. Sometimes people don't think before they open their yaps. What is likely? What are the logical possibilities?
This is media, derp, troll, and ignorant spin. Also, what is the long term advantage for the derps if Huber really did "lose" copies. What's gonna happen is gonna happen, regardless.
This "lost evidence" is nothing but food for trolls and dummies like we saw on that thread yesterday to somehow say Huber is deep state, incompetent, or whatever.
Short term pleasure and snivel grist.
As they say, there is no "there" there.
p.s. Nothing can stop what is coming.
Nothing.
p.p.s. Trolls, Huber didn't show cause there are CRIMINAL investigations happening. Also, you don't give evidence of a criminal investigation to leaky sieve Congress. That would be like handing over your evidence and plans to the suspects and the media. Very simple, really.
These peoples are stupit.
And yes, I mean you trolls too.
Bagster
Did 3 witnesses each send their info, or did all of them send their stuff 3 times?
At any rate, the S is HTF...
Eating unripe fruit makes you sick.
#AreWeVulcans
Bagster
Kalam wrote:
“”...Huber issued a total of 3 requests for the records, each time supplied by the whistleblowers. I can see that an extra copy would be useful to the other prosecutor with the same mandate, without alerting anyone of his/her existence, but am intrigued by the third copy. Dare I hope someone else needed a copy too?...”
Well, I wasnt going to say anything because I figured my answer was out in left field. But with your idea that one copy goes to the acknowledged second prosecutor I will add my thoughts.
My immediate reaction was that both President Trump and also Q wanted copies for personal posterity reasons. I now think, with the inclusion of your thoughts, that Q and the President want one copy to do their own research on. That would give us a total of the three original copies.”
That answers my question to bitt, all 3 witnesses sent 3 times.
I think I'm gonna have a "best meme maker" contest one day.
I will nominate you, goodman.
Which reminds me. Get those votes in for Person of the Year, and FReeQ of the Year.
Voter Turnout so far is disappointing.
Bagster
>>Eating unripe fruit makes you sick.
Eating ripe bananas makes you feel as if you’re going to GET sick.
So, you admit that you're the wild Indian in this scenario?
#TruthPioneer
Bagster
Maybe in lieu of flowers, it was a solicitation to donate to some drug abuse outreach program, children's home, or presidential library somewhere?
2608
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 0836cc No.4280231
Dec 12 2018 18:43:33 (EST)
Anonymous ID: 55302e No.4280212
Dec 12 2018 18:43:11 (EST)
>>4280189
What were in the envelopes ???
>>4280212
Our promise to 'counter'. Q
Could have also been “trade craft”.
Not that each request was made by an assistant to Huber, not the DAG himself. That would mean the dox were lost ^internally^. Was the DAG trying to see if they were INTENTIONALLY lost by a comped CF operative? Or, possibly the CoC was INTENTIONALLY violated internally by same.
And, on top of all of this, When asked if the Investigators (and [key point] *civilian whistleblowers*) had made conversation/communications with IG Horowitz, they both said, “No.”. immediately.
Meadows was playing good cop/bad cop...as assigned.
I get a whiff of the background presence of _your_ congresscritter, baggie.
Psycho alert.
I think that mental patient didn't take the blue or the red pill.
I think he took the LSD pill.
#SeenItAllTooOften
#SeenTooMuch
#IfTheseEyesCouldTalk
#TheydBeMouths
Bagster
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.