Posted on 12/10/2018 6:35:08 PM PST by EdnaMode
Where in the heck does NASA say that??
This is from the NASA (NAZI!!!!) Website
"The signal originated on the Moon, traveled through the emptiness of space back to Earth, and was received by tracking stations on the ground in Goldstone, California; Parkes, Australia; and Honeysuckle Creek, Australia. These three tracking stations recorded the original signal that included the television video, as well as voice, telemetry, and biomedical data. The data was recorded onto magnetic tapes, and simultaneously converted into a U.S. broadcast format for transmission to Houston and final release to U.S. television networks. The equipment used to convert the signal unfortunately caused some unavoidable loss of image quality."
OH and by the way the article I took this from is about the "lost" tapes which you seem to make a big deal of. NASA doesn't consider them "lost"...and they have 1st generation copies of the very few that are in storage somewhere.
Your explanation is much sounder then the whacky theories...but the camera was actually controlled remotely from earth. The following video shows the camera and outlines how it was done:
Hey Sontagged...here's a video where they actually perform an experiment to SEE the curve and figure out the drop over distance using telescopes and a helicopter. Warning: You may be triggered by it:
You're still holding to this??
Psa 19:1 The heavens declare the glory of God; And the firmament shows His handiwork.
Not surprising. Von Braun became very religious. He helped design rockets that went through the firmament and reached space. Yet you're completely making up a story that you think that Von Braun believed that the "firmament" is an unpenetrable barrier around the earth. His entire LIFE, practice, thoughts, words and public documentation completely dispel this idiotic notion.
1. The Empire Sate Building is in our earths atmosphere. AKA within the Van Allen Belt. 2. Planes flying at 35,000 feet are in our earths atmosphere. AKA within the Van Allen Belt. 3. Those satellites circling our planet are technically in our earths atmosphere. AKA within the Van Allen Belt.
Are you serious?? Neither the Empire State building or airplanes are anywhere NEAR the Van Allen belts. Some satellites might enter the region..not sure..I would think they would program the orbits to avoid it due to possible radiation damage.
4. The Moon is not in our atmosphere and well beyond the Van Allen Belt.
Well that's ONE thing you got right!
During the space race of the 60s no other country (Russia and China) sent any living thing (plant or animal) outside of the Van Allen Belt that didnt come back x-rayed to death. But, we did. Our government would never lie to us either.
Of course we did...because we spent billions and billions of dollars that the the other countries didn't have. The craft we sent out were shielded. The shielding is sufficient to stop nearly all radiation although there is slightly more exposure then a typical earther.
The RCA television camera (LM4) used on the lunar surface could be operated from three different positions: mounted on the LM modularized equipment storage assembly (MESA), mounted on a tripod and connected to the LM by a cable, and installed on the LRV with signal transmission through the lunar communication relay unit. While on the LRV, the camera was mounted on the ground-controlled television assembly.
The camera could be aimed and controlled by the astronauts or remotely controlled by personnel in the mission control center. Color was achieved by using a rotating disc driven by a 600-rpm motor.
Lunar color scenes were scanned, field sequentially, and down-linked serially to the Manned Space Flight Network. Video was received and recorded from lunar distance at any of the three Deep Space Stations.
"Deep Space Stations" were fed either 2"or 1" video tape, because that was easiest and was the standard for editing... if this was in fact video tape in the Apollo 17 lift off.
Not sure what "tracking stations" they are talking about ... but for SURE there was NOT a 1.5 second relay to Earth that would allow zoom and tilt on the color video camera to watch that toy take off and go up -- Apollo 17 footage.
Now, DouglasKC, please calm down. I'm not sure why this gets you so upset... this is just natural inquiry into how the creation of our Creator made things... it's all okay... The Lord knows the truth and it is our Christian duty to seek out the truth.
Remember the scariest thing in the Bible is:
"And those who no longer love the Truth, God will send a strong Delusion, so that they believe a Lie"...
We have to remember Truth does exist, and earnestly seek it, knowing that God is pleased with us when we do...
Memes and flat earth videos. Seriously. Most don't even bother to fact check even the most ludicrous claims.
Whoops...there you go again. Show me where NASA said any of this IN THE CONTEXT you mean. You're completely lying.
it "still" extols the glories of God's creation.
'You're still holding to this??"
Psa 19:1 The heavens declare the glory of God; And the firmament shows His handiwork.
Here's a great video with a presentation by someone who is an expert in photography AND staging shots. They prove that the moon landing was real.
NVIDIA Debunks Conspiracy Moon Theories
They ARE experts in lighting, photography and manipulation of reality via images.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4O5dPsu66Kw
These comments reflect my take, too.
Stevan Terzic
Get ready for Mars Landing people....this time we won't be able to find the fakery...with the current CGI Technology it will look indistinguishable.
Alex Gutierrez
Sensors aboard will record radiation levels for scientist to study, we must solve these challenges before we send people through this region of space.
CharlieSierra
I want my money back from purchasing Apollo 13
JonathanAnon
Why don't they just jump start the old Apollo space craft and send it to the moon again. No point in reinventing the wheel :-)
SiGUY E
Soooo.....They are saying they never went to the moon in 1969? Jason Ray
So easy back in the 60s
Adventures & Survival in Thailand
he's talking like Apollo never happened ?? totally weird
Why is it always NASA? No. For real, why is it that in all of these kinds of videos its always an American organisation that is supposedly faking everything. Never do I see stuff like this about the Russins, Chinese or Europeans. Am I missing something? Because to me it seems very unlikely the US would have the power to supress every other county to make sure they dont leak out thier secrets. Feel free to correct me...
Spencer Jarvis To the people saying that in 1969 we didnt go through the belts, we avoided them, went around them... ok, so why are we going through them on this orion mission? why are we not avoiding them again?
Frank M They should just use 50 year old tech from the 60's. There problem solved.
Matt x What I don't get it how they justify having to do tests to get through the belts, when they supposedly already have many years ago now.
Mike Rusby someone called alan went to the moon in a van? or did I read it wrong:) G Heald
Answer the question. How did the Apollo astronauts survive these belts with no affect on their rudimentary computer if you now have to figure out how to get through them?
Vince Wynne
Godspeed Neil Armstrong - we're gonna be televising the ENTIRE THING. Better not DIE up there. Nah...never happened. Hollywood production, fantastic piece of film history. Kubrick's uncredited finest work.
KMURPH311 You numb nuts who think it didnt happen in the sixties/seventies need to do yourselves a favor and quit commenting. Todays technology is far more susceptible to radiation/emp/ etc. than the vacuum tubes and hydraulics used back then. Computers as we know them today were a thing of fantasy when Apollo launched.
It is a completely different ball game today. And the shielding isnt as complicated. This video is created to make this interesting to the general public. And fear sells. Watch what happens sells
You all probably think the earth is flat as well.
Go eat your tide pods
Barry Mayson
The computers that sent men to the moon you can now get onto a fly's balls. The radiation affects from long distances and also the radiation belts can kill a modern computer fastest than EMP. The shielding test I suspect are for the electronics but the one of the best shielding is plain water. I watched the moon landings live and do you think at the height of the cold war Russia was not monitoring every thing and would have not have accused the landings as false!!! The technology to fake them was just not available. The moon is nothing it has some resources but the economics to get them would be stupid.
No reason to spend billions to build a base! The main point of the race to the moon was political it was to beat Russia as they had the first satellite then the first man in space the US wanted something to wave about!
The Last Kingdom Hm..... so they can safely pass the van allen belt back in 60s twice, once going up and once going down with no concern of its danger, now were like... this stuff is dangerous one going up and once going down.
Oksanna Zoschenko Is it just me or did anyone else notice how Orion looks similar to the old Soviet rockets?
Jam Rock So China went to moon and back recently but the USA somehow forget how to return. Well simply because they never went to the moon before....🤔
J Rizz Scientific theory is theory. Therefore, a theory is a theory and theories are derived by attempts to make a certain phenomena truth. Theory is not fact and they are always being debunked by another theory. Since science is based on theory, its their way of placing the did you read the fine print before signing? To cover their behinds. Now Pluto isnt considered a planet anymore??? When in grade school 25 yrs ago they taught kids it was. Challenge yourself and all that you hear, just dont speak on it until you have hard objective proof.
Meanwhile Im off to watch Elon Dunse and his Tesla fly around in outer space, I hear they are Flyving to Mars. How cool is that? GROUND BREAKING!!!!!! Great Scott!!!!
Roy Mackey He says at 3:35 that "we must solve the challenges of the Van Allen belts before we can send people through this region..."
Wait a minute.... I thought we already did!!! : ) If he keeps making mistakes like this he could end up shooting himself in the back of the head. At least if you believe the stories about others who have made mistakes like this in the past and put themselves on the sucide list.
MrThehbus All except maybe 1 of the Apollo astronauts lived to old age. When they supposedly made journeys through the Radiation Belt, and didnt die. Now in 2017 NASA is trying to figure out a safe way to go through it again? I have an idea use the same shield you used during Apollo that should work. People will believe nonsense simply because authority tells them to.
Axelito Deejay I thought they solved these challenges back in 1969? Thats some bullshit! Like Chuck D once said... Can't Trust it!!!
NASA ENGINEER ADMITS THEY CAN'T GET PAST THE VAN ALLEN BELTS ANYMORE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4O5dPsu66Kw Forgot to give the title here.
P.S. Douglas KC, you have to calm down.
Again, it's all okay, you don't have to be so upset, this is just inquiry into the nature of God's creation, something that we are duty-bound to do.
Especially when we know NASA is a liberal, Islam-loving, Climate Change loving, UN loving organization.
Conservatives need to beware all liberal orgs... like NASA
Ummmm...he NEVER SAID they can't get past he Van Allen belt. THAT'S a MISLEADING statement BY a critic of NASA.
NASA never said it or admitted it. It's fantasy by lying flat earthers who can't win an argument any other way.
I'm not upset. I'm just being blunt and not embracing your delusions. At. All.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wl1H1WxWTuc "The problem is we don't have the technology anymore to go to the moon"
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.