Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SaxxonWoods

If you have never heard it before and just became aware of it, then you are jumping to a wrong conclusion based on listening to a fragment of one show.

Since last December/January, he has been the foremost voice on the right bringing all of these disparate sources of information together into a cogent summary. He has published a book on it, and used his insight as an upper level Secret Service investigative agent to connect the dots.

I think you are making a mistake by belittling his show based on a fragment.

This is not an insult to you...I just think you need to actually listen to him. He has put out a show nearly every single day since January and has not missed a day to my knowledge.

I think you are doing him and yourself an injustice by passing judgement in that fashion. He is the least unserious person out there.


23 posted on 12/03/2018 7:40:54 PM PST by rlmorel (Leftists: They believe in the "Invisible Hand" only when it is guided by government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: rlmorel
I don't dislike Dan, but he is a one trick pony. His show focuses almost exclusively on Spygate and so yes, it can be interesting and it appears he knows people in certain spots who will give tidbits of information.

90% of his show is repeating what has been said in his previous 900 shows including the famous 688 show that was his highest rated (I guessed at the numbers). He just says it in a different way every day. I listen because a lot of Spygate is confusing and it helps to hear it in an attempt to better understand all the layers. But insight? Not so much.

When he talks about anything other than Spygate, it really isn't all that interesting. His thinking is not particularly unique, interesting or fresh.

I suppose it isn't fair to compare him to Rush, but Rush is the gold standard. Rush is always thoughtful, interesting and engaging and Rush normally does not scream at you the way Dan does. Dan has that hyped up voice who doesn't seem to realize a microphone has an amazing ability in 2018 to transport his voice without talking at an exaggerated level and at break neck speed. And then, there's Joe, which I will spare you my thoughts.

I think Dan is great for this period of time and I have told many they should listen to him to become more informed about SpyGate. I appreciate his earnest approach (yes, he is serious), his honesty that nothing is going to happen to these people, but as time marches on and people lose interest in Spygate, I'm not certain Dan stays relevant as a commentator. I just checked and I don't think he is syndicated, but is a podcast only show.

47 posted on 12/04/2018 12:16:29 AM PST by Dave W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson