Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: hardspunned

” I believe EMP is a more credible threat than the nuclear exchange we’ve all feared since the 50s.”

An all out nuclear war would probably doom the planet to years long nuclear winter but any nation with an icbm and tactical nuke could destroy us or any other country with one or two EMPs. To me that makes Iran and N. Korea more dangerous than Russia or China.


46 posted on 11/30/2018 1:56:01 PM PST by antidemoncrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: antidemoncrat

The MAD doctrine has protected the nuclear club countries from an exchange since the 50’s. Two or three nukes launched from a freighter in the Gulf of Mexico using old scuds would cripple the USA and result in tens of millions of eventual deaths. The scariest part is we possibly wouldn’t know who did it. With this scenario you lose your deterrent capability because you can’t retaliate.


63 posted on 11/30/2018 2:24:30 PM PST by hardspunned
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

To: antidemoncrat

“but any nation with an icbm and tactical nuke could destroy us or any other country with one or two EMPs”

Nonsense.


67 posted on 11/30/2018 2:38:00 PM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson